1. The ground game is changing in Iraq. Policy convergence is appropriate. As I've said, the choice is not between empire and defeat. I supported the surge because it was good military tactics, but good military tactics had been nested within rotten political strategy in Iraq almost since the outset. (Predated by, even.) My support for a ninja-like stealth reverse surge, a parceled and staged withdrawal in times and places of our choosing, now seems like a prescription of prudence and normalcy.
2. Although I'm against large numbers of noncitizens living lives of permanent residence in America, I'm always looking for ways to defuse a battle royale with uberlibertarians. One way to do this is to look at
the numbers Kerry Howley has provided us and say -- okay, so if we import and export, on a staggered basis, half-decently-sized cohorts of non-migratory foreign workers (presumably stable human beings with skills), we get such a bigger bang for our and their buck that we can scale down some of our less effective attempts, public and private, at bettering the lives of others? Attempts like foreign aid and Gerson-style intervention? This sounds like an excellent idea. Bringing a modest crew of disadvantaged strangers here to America, as sort of a one-time gift of friendship that keeps on giving when they return home, would allow us to feel better about ourselves while having to do it on a far more face-to-face basis...and without gallivanting all over the world to gratify our sense of messianism. A win-win.
3. Ross returns from the Bat Cave to
hint that Burton's Batmans are better than Nolan's because they don't labor to transcend themselves. Sounds like a veiled attack on Obama-style politics. Hmm. Actually, I haven't seen Nolan's Batman yet. But in talking with my maniacal friend and
Lawler-beloved movie guru Peter Suderman, over a fat lunch of coconut shrimp and gin & grapefruit, we agreed that a film which tries to hold the audience to account for thrilling to evil is better than a film which soft-pedals the truth about wickedness -- even if that certain hypocrisy in offering a thrill later to be damned is unavoidable. We concluded that George Romero is perhaps best at this trick, which indeed isn't a trick when done well as much as it is a reckoning with what's bad in human nature, and an attempt to raise our souls through mortification, like Kafka. Dangerous business, but necessary.
4. If Obama
really does pick Veneman, the main effect will be to force moderate Republicans and RINOs into an even tougher spot, including McCain himself. Deep right types will flip their lid, smiting anyone in the big tent who looks even a little crosseyed, and everyone will be forced to choose a side. On the other hand, liberal Democrats will have to reckon with the possibility that Obama really does have the largest ego of our times.
5. The widow Thompson,
Anita, writes on the Dalai Lama. I will bite my tongue. I report, you decide.
Recent Comments